REVISION DATE: 20-Oct-2016 12:40:03

 
Email from Mike Kehoe on 10/19/2016 8:26 AM: 
 
Greetings All,
 
Casey finished assembly and testing of RS6 last week. Please find attached the pre-delivery report.  The data is at the usual site:   
 file:  MOBY Red file dated 10/18/16.  The system is ready so ship, so please let me  
know when you are ready to receive it. 
 
We should be receiving two fiber bundles later this week.  We plan to assemble the last remaining red system, RS5, as the next build.   
That will close out the Red system orders. 
 
Best, 
Mike 

Below are my graphs of the mobyred_sphere_seven.bip file. The file contains 12 dark images at 0.1 sec Note some graphs are dark corrected and some are not so check the axis labels to know what you are looking at.

Note the one dark image collected for this data was not quite right. I subtracted 200 ADU from the entire dark images to get the track 7 data to not be negative but this did not work for the other tracks. Low signal data and cross track at the edges could be off by an unknown amount.

I took the 12 images and meaned them to get the surface plot below.

Figure 1

Same as the previous images but with the dark image subtracted.

Figure 2

This is a cross section through the tracks at wavelength pixel 900, with one line for each of the 12 images (darks are subtracted).

Figure 3

Same as the previous graph but zoomed into the bottom to see the level of the darks between the tracks. Dark had 200 ADU added to them. This is the image I used to decide to subtract 200 ADU.

Figure 4

Same as figure 2 but for Wavelength pixel 400 (darks are subtracted)

Figure 5

Again this is the mean image with slices thought the image at different wavelength pixels (darks are subtracted).

Figure 6

Same as figure 6 but zoomed to the bottom so you can see the darks between the tracks (darks are subtracted).

Figure 7

Same as figure 7 but zoomed into the dark area between tracks 5 and 6 so you can see the amount of light getting between the tracks (darks are subtracted). It varies by wavelength.

Figure 8

The same cross track plots but zoomed to the bottom and not dark corrected with the dark plotted at a black line (wavelength pixel 900).

Figure 9

The same cross track plots but zoomed to the bottom and not dark corrected with the dark plotted at a black line (wavelength pixel 400).

Figure 10

Track data which is dark subtracted, track 8 is the only one illuminated so we can get a cross track percentage

Figure 11

A zoom in of each dark and lite for each track. You can see that subtracking 200 did not work for all the tracks. In some cases the darks are higher and in others the lights are higher.

Figure 12

I calculated the Ratio of each track to track 7 and then multiplied bu 100 to get percentage. THis is going to be off because of the darks.

Figure 13