REVISION DATE: 22-Apr-2015 14:24:54

The idea here is to look at the change in the saddle shape for the same wavelength/pix and track. The tables show greater details about the files chosen like the intergration time and gain and max ADU. I have tried to removed the Gain 1,2 and 4 saturated data. Gain 1 saturated data are track data greater than 20,000 ADU and for the Gain2 and 4 the cutoff is 59,000 ADU. I also removed the integration times below 0.2 seconds for the lamp data. I then normalized the laser and lamp data between 0 and 1 for ease of comparison. I used the laser wavelengths to chose which wavelength to create graphs for. Plotted first is the day 1 and day 4 laser data, note integration times and gains may be different, use the table to check this. Then I added the lamp data from day 2 and 3. This will show the saddle shape with a different source. I looked for lamp data with the track specified illuminated and then picked only 5 intergration times. The 5 integration times are spread eavenly from lowest to greatest to give an idea if int time matters. I should mention that Track 1 does have a shape change problem with the low intergration times. The ylabel says the units are ADU, no the data are not divided by integration time or number of pixels. But if a dark or back ground file exists then the darks have been subtracted. And they exist for 99% of the files.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8