REVISION DATE: 08-Jul-2015 15:17:43

Es data collected by Mike using a MOBY Ed head, this is track 7 only.

Mikes email: The first 4 scans had Ed pointing straight up, sitting next to the tent. Then I thought it might be nice not to "see" the tent, so the next 4 had the Ed mounted on a tripod, pointed towards the (lower) sun.

Notice the shoulder on file number 1. Which does not make sense since they where all set to the same shutter timing. Weird. So the first data set is not used in the cross track plots at the bottom.

Figure 1

The Es data with darks subtracted and these are track means but not divided by integration time.

Figure 2

The Es data divided by integration times.

Figure 3

I also wanted to look at the cross track data so this shows the cross track data on each side of track 7. A very intersting feature a pixel 800. I think is is the infrared artifact??? See figure 6 for a zoom of th image. Also note the feature in the green lines at pixels 0-30. What is this? See figure 7 for a image showing this feature.

Figure 4

The cross track divided by the track 7 data to get a percent. I have plotted it as a log graph because the UV is so high it hides the data from pixel 200 down. Nice to see that for the most part it is fairly stable over the Es data set collected.

Figure 5

A zoom in of the image from the last file where the infrared artifact is largest so you can see it on the image. Dashed lines are the track edges. Interesting that you only see it on one side of the track.

Figure 6

A zoom in of the image from the last file so you can see the feature on track 8 at pixel 0-30. Interetsing. Any idea what this is???? It increases the UV cross track by A LOT. Seems to appear only on track 8.

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9