plt_inttime_ - BS04

REVISION DATE: 18-Dec-2017 14:41:38

Mike did a quick exposure time cal. Using Mike detailed email and the int cal from MOBY-L267 day 7 I calculated a calibrated integration times. My method differed from Mikes in that I meaned all the 1 sec and 10 sec data so I normalized by the mean a 1 sec etc. See explainations below for more details about each step. Note: Data are in ADU/pix (the per pixel is because this is a track mean). They are all NET signals (lite - backgrounds)

I did not used the Dimmer data mike took at the higher int times. I will add those later.


L267
Nominal
(sec)
Measred
(sec)
0.0500 0.0987
0.0700 0.1168
0.1000 0.1451
0.2000 0.2382
0.3000 0.3338
0.5000 0.5226
0.7000 0.7134
1.0000 1.0000
2.0000 1.9530
3.0000 2.9081
5.0000 4.8259
7.0000 6.7544
10.0000 9.6545
20.0000 19.2499
30.0000 28.8712
50.0000 48.2035
70.0000 67.6464
100.0000 96.9097

image

Figure 1

The data where collected a three different lamp levels ("Brite", "Mid", and "Dim") to be able to get a full range of integration times. You can see all the levels here.


image

Figure 2

Track 13 data normalized using the step down ratios. So the 1 sec repeats from Bright to Mid and the 10 sec repeats from Mid to Dim plot on top of each other.


image

Figure 3

I am not totally sure what this graph is showing but I copied it from Mikes email. Email section below: I checked the Net Sig repeats at 1 sec for the Brite lamp (+/- 0.5%), and at 1 sec for the Mid lamp (+/- 1%), and at 10 sec for the Dim lamp (+/- 1.5%).Since they seemed OK, and the PD mon repeats were essentially 1, I did my Net Sig "normalizing" to the nearest-in-time 1 sec exposure Net Sig at Brite & Mid lamp settings, and to the nearest-in-time 10 sec net at Dim lamp setting(hopefully this will make sense below!). Yea, it looks the same as Mikes, now I need to understand what we are checking for here.


image

Figure 4

Checking the integration time repeatability within each lamp level. So I found all the Brite 1 sec and divided by the mean to get the variation about the mean. I did the same for the 1 sec Mid and 10 sec Dim data. This looked really good.


image

Figure 5

The Photodiode data normalized to the level changes using PDmonitor data.


image

Figure 6

The left panel is the Same data from Figure 2. The right panel is each int time divided by the mean 1 sec data and integration time. I then calculated the mean for each ratio from pixels 300-900 and a std.


image

Figure 7

A plot of the ratio of measured over nominal Exposure time.


image

Figure 8

A plot of the ratio of measured over nominal Exposure time but with the x-axis in log scale.


image

Figure 9

Zoomed in to the higher int time numbers with error bars.


image

Figure 10

Comparison of MOBY262 pre and post int cal and the MBOY264 int cal


image

Figure 11

Same graphs as above but zoomed in



pwd: E:\zflora\mldata\mobyrefresh\characterizations\intial\MOBY-L267\bs4cal\day07
Date: 18-Dec-2017 14:41:39
Created from plt_inttime_(1)